If you read the original post you were replying to, then read your post, your post appears to be only tangentially related, utilizes sarcasm and implied politic

If you read the original post you were replying to, then read your post, your post appears to be only tangentially related, utilizes sarcasm and implied political hostility, and makes an accusation that doesn't seem warranted. The post you were replying to seemed to be genuinely referring to the same platform's famous fact-checking of Trump, merely as a point of comparison. There was no implication of some kind of hypocritical opinion regarding whom should and should not be fact-checked. That's what causes these kinds of rambling forks in threads.