3 ms·
After sleeping on it, I'm not really happy with how my comment reads. Editing with an addition that clarifies my position. ... or wait, I forgot you can't do t
by ryukoposting 5y ago
After sleeping on it, I'm not really happy with how my comment reads. Editing with an addition that clarifies my position.
... or wait, I forgot you can't do that after a certain time period. Let me be clear:
1. Given what information we currently have, I feel that CppCon organizers shouldn't allow Mr. X to present at/attend the event.
2. It's the organizers' right to decide who can attend their event, and it's my right to not associate myself with them/their events.
3. #include made multiple mistakes while trying to get to the bottom of this issue.
> You really think it's appropriate for a victim of sexual abuse to communicate with Mr X?
Obviously not, but you cannot tell me that there are zero members of #include leadership who aren't rape victims. I highly doubt that Mr. X has any argument that would be worth considering. I'm not saying Mr. X's words would have any impact on #include's position (or my position) whatsoever. I'm saying it's counterproductive to not at least feign diplomacy.