4 ms·
Slack should at least bridge to an open protocol, if not use one outright, so I can use any client I want. Like they used to.
by brimble 5y ago
Slack should at least bridge to an open protocol, if not use one outright, so I can use any client I want.
Like they used to.
- smazga 5y agoThe gloss of Slack was lost to me when they took down the irc and xmpp bridges. I really liked the freedom to do it my way. Then it became just another crappy messaging app.
- jacobr1 5y agoIf all you want is messaging, use irc, matrix or an xmpp system. The real value of slack is all the integrations and ecosystem built on top of it. That is much harder to integrate with an arbitrary client. It could be done, they could publish "enriched messaging" standards or similar and breakout capabilities that clients could support, but just supporting vanilla messaging at this point would be a severe degradation of slack's capabilities.
- temp0826 5y agoRipcord [0] supports slack, but probably lacks a few features. It's very fast. [0] https://cancel.fm/ripcord/ https://cancel.fm/ripcord/
- elldoubleyew 5y agoFriendly reminder that using third party clients is against Discord ToS and under certain circumstances can get your account banned[0]. [0] https://twitter.com/anno0770/status/1349187069793460225 https://twitter.com/anno0770/status/1349187069793460225