3 ms·
Well at least it’s better than numpy’s csv functions. For my use case (~4 million images, one row per image, 2048 fp32 columns for features extracted with resne
by NavinF 5y ago
Well at least it’s better than numpy’s csv functions. For my use case (~4 million images, one row per image, 2048 fp32 columns for features extracted with resnet), parsing/encoding csv with pandas was 10x faster than with numpy. Of course serializing the arrays to/from npy was 10x faster than any csv library.