5 ms·
Her twitter (which Lunduke links to, and copied tweets from) very prominently features her new name. I'm not saying it can't be accidental (in which case you d
by faho 5y ago
Her twitter (which Lunduke links to, and copied tweets from) very prominently features her new name.
I'm not saying it can't be accidental (in which case you do what you do when you've accidentally been rude - apologize, correct your mistake and move on), but it is at least careless.
- pell 5y agoA few years ago Lunduke kept sharing some views that I would place in the more “reactionary“ spectrum. I’m not sure he ever distanced himself from that. He did interview Danielle a few years back however.(1) So maybe it simply was a careless mistake. (1) https://www.networkworld.com/article/3130760/elementary-os-04-review-and-interview-with-the-founder.html https://www.networkworld.com/article/3130760/elementary-os-0...
- ddtaylor 5y ago> Her twitter (which Lunduke links to, and copied tweets from) very prominently features her new name. It's worth mentioning the twitter handle is still "DanielFore"
- faho 5y agoThis is incorrect, the twitter handle is "DaniElainaFore" - https://mobile.twitter.com/DaniElainaFore https://mobile.twitter.com/DaniElainaFore As you can see in the linked screenshots. Try to open the old handle and you will find one tweet telling you she's moved to the new one.
- ddtaylor 5y agoThis handle is actually pretty new since the post-sex transition.
- faho 5y agoThis handle is in the archive links the article points to, and that's the important part. Lunduke had this handle on his screen, and either missed it or chose to ignore it on purpose. The former is careless and sloppy, especially if you're trying to do journalism. The latter is very rude, to put it mildly.