5 ms·
There has been a long discussion about the respective merits of modern replacements for the twister, such as PCG [1][2][3] IMO, for monte-carlo type stuff (lik
by ur-whale 5y ago
There has been a long discussion about the respective merits of modern replacements for the twister, such as PCG [1][2][3]
IMO, for monte-carlo type stuff (like your path tracer), PCG is good enough.
Here's another discussion: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/337927/is-pcg-random-number-generator-as-good-as-claimed https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/337927/is-pcg-rand...
[1] https://prng.di.unimi.it/ https://prng.di.unimi.it/
[2] https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/on-vignas-pcg-critique.html https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/on-vignas-pcg-critique.html
[3] https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2021/04/29/reinventing-rng/ https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2021/04/29/reinventing-rng/
- logos001 5y agoI suppose the question is do you really need to get rid of the Mersenne-Twister? Most of the modern variants are good enough for most practical purposes. https://chasethedevil.github.io/post/war-of-the-random-number-generators/ https://chasethedevil.github.io/post/war-of-the-random-numbe...