3 ms·
Ok... but then you have significantly worse pixel density than a 5k monitor. There's no way to have your cake and eat it too on this, either you'll have worse
by BoorishBears 5y ago
Ok... but then you have significantly worse pixel density than a 5k monitor.
There's no way to have your cake and eat it too on this, either you'll have worse pixel density, or you'll need a very unnatural setup.
- jimrandomh 5y ago8k/65in has the same pixel density as a 4k/32.5in, which is mid-range as computer monitors go. 16k would be nice if that was possible to buy, but this pixel density is good enough for my purposes.
- BoorishBears 5y ago4k/32" might as well be 1440p compared to 5k/27" You talking to someone who upgraded from a 4k/32" equivalent ("5k" 40" ultrawide) to the XDR just for the pixel density increase, and it's no contest at all: even the most casual PC user would immediately appreciate the bump.