3 ms·
Yes, that's all correct. I chose Floyd (and Gibson) because they are famous. I am also comparing Floyds crime to the unnamed person's crime and to Gibson's famo
by Gunax 5y ago
Yes, that's all correct. I chose Floyd (and Gibson) because they are famous. I am also comparing Floyds crime to the unnamed person's crime and to Gibson's famous tirade.
But I am not comparing Floyd's murder to anything. His murder is not related.
Yes, you can replace them with hypothetical people if you want.
- olliej 5y agoYou made the choice about bringing someone like Floyd into this. you thought that there was an equivalence to make. Here’s the thing: no one said Floyd wasn’t an excon, and his crime did severely limit his options in life. It is inescapable though that if you bring in Floyd for his “fame” that you are comparing the thing that made them famous: being murdered vs being anti-Semitic