4 ms·
Thats sounding more like being an Apple apologist. And there are certainly other uses of graphics without using PS or InDesign involved e.g Meshlab 3D renders,
by srvmshr 5y ago
Thats sounding more like being an Apple apologist. And there are certainly other uses of graphics without using PS or InDesign involved e.g Meshlab 3D renders, computer graphics & raytracing where more RAM definitely counts. Upselling the Studio definitely hits the academic bracket (mine) hard, when it was perfectly possible to just introduce M1 variants, with its advantage of ports & more RAM. That sort of upgrade would have cost ~$1500 theoretically given Apple component listing, which is still 25% cheaper than baseline Mac Studio.
(For students looking to upgrade, $400 is a month's rent saved)
- thaw13579 5y agoI suppose the M1 pro is such a variant with more ports and more memory? For the M1 itself, it seems there are interesting aspects of the chip design that limit the total memory: https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-new-Mac-mini-with-Apple-M1-only-have-a-max-of-16GB-RAM-whereas-the-Intel-has-up-to-64GB https://www.quora.com/Why-does-the-new-Mac-mini-with-Apple-M... I also make no apologies for saying nice things about the current lineup, it's a clear improvement over 2016-2020 which I think was a step back in several ways.