> NATO has never been a force for unilateral aggression Tell that to people in Iraq... Or other countries NATO been fucking with for a while now. During cold

> NATO has never been a force for unilateral aggression Tell that to people in Iraq... Or other countries NATO been fucking with for a while now. During cold war for example NATO-aligned countries happily went around doing coups, sometimes backed with force (for example a US aircraft carrier threatening to bomb Rio de Janeiro in case of Brazil), replacing democratically elected presidents with dictators that would do whatever NATO wanted, how that is NOT unilateral aggression? Libya is a special case even, they were doing everything NATO wanted for most part, trying to make amends and create a good relationship, and got fucked anyway, NATO even gave air cover to people commiting black genocide there, what Tawergha people did to NATO to justify its "defense"?