> distortion-loaded shaming definitely isn't the way to accomplish that. I'd go further and say the poster you're responding to is non charitable and down righ

> distortion-loaded shaming definitely isn't the way to accomplish that. I'd go further and say the poster you're responding to is non charitable and down right hateful, violating at least two community guidelines: > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community. > Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.