3 ms·
PolitiFact's article is foolishly splitting hairs. The concern about Keystone XL's exports was never about the oil but the refined products (gas, etc). The Tex
by giantrobot 5y ago
PolitiFact's article is foolishly splitting hairs. The concern about Keystone XL's exports was never about the oil but the refined products (gas, etc). The Texas refineries that would have been at the XL's terminus already export a majority of their refined products.
They're not the only refineries that handle heavy crude but they are the ones with the easiest access to the export markets of Central and South America.
- kodah 5y ago> It is true that exports of petroleum products from Gulf Coast refineries have increased considerably in recent years. That’s part of why PolitiFact rated a similar statement by Obama Mostly False in 2014. While the trend adds a grain of truth to her claim, it does not mean all of the oil that will come from the Keystone XL pipeline will be immediately exported. I don't think it's splitting hairs, that's the main point of the conclusion. What she said: The Keystone XL pipeline "doesn’t even have any oil for America." is verifiably untrue.
- stainforth 5y agoSo what percentage would you state would be destined for export?
- kodah 5y agoWell, the Keystone XL doubles our capacity in the US but pales in comparison to overall demand. Based on what I read I'd expect that most of the pipeline would be used to replace hostile and unreliable sources at a minimum.