4 ms·

There is a lot of support for M1. See these lists. Please note though that "playable" does not mean "on par with other platforms", ie, Windows and Xbox / Playst

There is a lot of support for M1. See these lists. Please note though that "playable" does not mean "on par with other platforms", ie, Windows and Xbox / Playstation. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1er-NivvuIheDmIKBVRu3S_BzA_lZT5z3Z-CxQZ-uPVs/htmlview#gid=0 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1er-NivvuIheDmIKBVRu3... https://applesilicongames.com/ https://applesilicongames.com/

lelandfe 5y ago
I believe OP meant Mac, not M1 - I.e. that there are many multitudes of AAA games that still have not hit macOS. You’re right, though, that M1 has pretty decent parity with Intel Macs for games now.
neogodless 5y ago
Games I've played over the past two years: Valheim - not in database ARK: Survival Evolved - "game won't launch" Conan: Exiles - not in database Grounded - not in database Civ V and Civ VI - each shows one record and seems it ran for that person (30-60 fps - for comparison, both run 144 fps on my $1000 Lenovo laptop.) It Takes Two - not in database That's all anecdotal, i.e. the games this one person likes to play are not supported, or don't play very well, and some of them are 5+ years old. Overall the point being, it's hard to shell out all that money for a device that won't play your games. (If this sort of gaming is part of your computer use case). So to that original comment's point "I wish Mac worked seriously well for gaming."
- sprkwd 5y ago
  Not sure why you need a turn based game to run at 144fps. But I guess that’s a different conservation.
  - kronks 5y ago
jamesy0ung 5y ago
X-Plane is great on M1.