3 ms·
> Losses also occur at a much faster rate. USSR in WWII was losing on average about 5000 (five thousand) soldiers per day. So no.
by weregiraffe 5y ago
> Losses also occur at a much faster rate.
USSR in WWII was losing on average about 5000 (five thousand) soldiers per day. So no.
- Steltek 5y agoRussia's losses today would be much higher if they could figure out logistics. Ukraine might be running out of targets on the front lines. /s More seriously, think about it percentage wise. Russia is losing resources (tanks, missiles, etc) in a hurry. And the floor is not "zero XYZ remaining" otherwise they would have nothing left in the entire country to defend themselves with. They only have what they allocated for their idiotic invasion and no more. Russia may already be running low on cruise missiles based on the relatively peaceful night in Kyiv.
- xdennis 5y agoGP was referring to material loses. Ukraine shot down 4 Su-34. Russia has 134 of them. It takes years to build them. In WW2, there were thousands of planes and tanks, but they were unsophisticated and quick to build. The number of soldiers is also not comparable since modern armies aren't so large anymore.