3 ms·
You have a point, maybe the bad hires can be detected in weeks instead of months, but you still waste the same amount of time on the HR side. And if you only ha
by visarga 5y ago
You have a point, maybe the bad hires can be detected in weeks instead of months, but you still waste the same amount of time on the HR side. And if you only have one position on your team to fill that year, you may be cautious how you assign it.
- justshowpost 5y agoWell, you’re not forced to straight-up hire the candidate just from Litebulb, right? A score in a report should not be assumed to reflect the entirety of a person, which unfortunately is a common mistake (e.g. school, college or university diploma). You’d most likely want to still sit down and talk with your candidates and evaluate them individually, which you'd have to do anyways if you want too see if they fit your individual company. Litebulb just replaces what would otherwise be stupid LeetCode Q&As or old unmaintained home-rolled coding problems, not the rest of the hiring process. Specifically, Litebulb does not offer “the magic button” to find the perfect hire for your specific company.