4 ms·
If they don't have time to read the paper, they aren't investing in the argument enough, and at that point you know the other person is not open to being wrong,
by fallat 5y ago
If they don't have time to read the paper, they aren't investing in the argument enough, and at that point you know the other person is not open to being wrong, which then you respect and end the conversation.
- austinjp 5y agoOn a one-to-one basis, that might be one approach. On a system- or industry-wide basis, this approach fails to address the real issue of the significant time taken for evidence to reach patients. Simply walking away leaves the problem unresolved.