7 ms·
Well I'm a writer of excessively long content... including a twenty thousand word review of The Social Network. http://reviewsindepth.com/2010/11/the-social-n
by grovulent 15y ago
Well I'm a writer of excessively long content... including a twenty thousand word review of The Social Network.
http://reviewsindepth.com/2010/11/the-social-network-the-end-of-intimacy-and-the-birth-of-hacker-sensibility/ http://reviewsindepth.com/2010/11/the-social-network-the-end...
It makes an interesting test case of what people are willing to put up with length wise in a blog post.
In this case the post has been visited 11763 times by 10880 uniques. The average time on page is 8 minutes and 3 seconds. Certainly not long enough to read the entire article - but it's a fairly significant degree of engagement.
Different sources yield differing amounts of engagement. Avg time on page for (min:sec)
Facebook: 23:41
Google: 13.37
Hacker News: 12.42
Twitter: 9:00
Reddit: 6:12
givementsomethingtoread.com: 5:18
instapaper: 4:47
tumblr: 2:32
stumbleupon: 0:06
- lachenmayer 15y agoIf that average time is a mean time, then that would mean that you do have a significant number of people reading the entire article. I would assume that people who are skimming the content, or just leaving straight away would only spend a couple of seconds, a minute max on the site. Also, it is very interesting that the average time for people from Facebook is so much higher than all the others!