3 ms·
> What has "the west" done that's remotely comparable to Crimea or South Ossetia? by the way West destroyed Iraq, there is a hell now. West destroyed Lybia,
by vogre 5y ago
> What has "the west" done that's remotely comparable to Crimea or South Ossetia?
by the way
West destroyed Iraq, there is a hell now.
West destroyed Lybia, there is a hell now.
West destroyed Afghanistan, there is a hell now.
West destroyed Serbia, ask Serbians, what do they think of NATO
There is peace in Crimea, there is a peace in South Ossetia. Nobody is shooting. The life is poor, mostly because of the west sanctions, but people are safe.
- xdennis 5y ago* The west didn't annex any of those (except for Kosovo). * Libya was given a no fight zone at the request of the people. It was a mistake, but the intentions were noble. * Afghanistan started as a fair war. They gave aid to people who attacked a NATO country. It was completely fair to invade. Trying to nation-build it was a mistake though. But again, noble. * Intervening on the side of the muslim terrorists in Kosovo was a mistake and some people in NATO (like us Romanians) opposed it (although our government supported it). * The Russian occupied areas are hell holes. Transnistria is literally soviet.
- dzikimarian 5y ago> West destroyed Serbia, ask Serbians, what do they think of NATO Ask Croatians and Bosnians what they think about Serbs. Basically Serbia tried to do to them, exactly what Russia is doing now to Ukraine. Btw Serbia is starting to do pretty well comparing to when they were under USSR influence. > There is peace in Crimea, there is a peace in South Ossetia. Nobody is shooting. Nobody was shooting in entire Ukraine, before Russia decided to start stealing their country.