4 ms·
> They are not a benevolent actor but a business who ultimately only does things to improve their own bottom line and their reach over the internet. Google has
by runeks 5y ago
> They are not a benevolent actor but a business who ultimately only does things to improve their own bottom line and their reach over the internet.
Google has interests, just like you and I. Neither you, me or Google are “benevolent actors”.
I don’t at all mind when less-than-perfect entities help people — regardless of what else they do that is right or wrong.
Google, as a group of human beings, does both good and bad. To claim that it’s problematic to accept help from people who are members of a group of people who also do bad things means we would also have to deny help from e.g. well-meaning Russian citizens.
- philovivero 5y ago> Neither you, me or Google are “benevolent actors”. This is nihilism. Google is definitely not a benevolent actor, as we can determine by examining the actions of the company over the past many years. I assume you also are malevolent, by your own admission. But your insinuation, that no-one is a benevolent actor, is so far off the mark I struggle to imagine how you hold that opinion. Have you considered therapy?
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]