3 ms·
I can't get my head around why the govt. is now talking openly about this subject after casting it into the "basement" after project blue book. You have these p
by subsubzero 5y ago
I can't get my head around why the govt. is now talking openly about this subject after casting it into the "basement" after project blue book. You have these patents the Navy recently applied for and received that indicate(if believed)[1] that the govt. now has craft that can also achieve stuff like what was described by OP. So for me it really comes down to 3 scenarios:
1 - The crafts are non-human technology, the US knows what they are(non-human technology) and at first ridiculed anyone who confirmed a sighting, and now is putting out phony patents to save face.
2 - The US or some other earthly government created these objects and is running dis-info by stating they are unknown, and now talking about these patents to scare other countries about this technology.
3 - The US has no idea what they are and hence why they shelved project blue book as the idea of a craft that can penetrate the US's defenses at any time is uncomfortable, they are now playing statecraft games by these patents and now getting interested in UAPs.
1 - https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-got-ufo-patent-granted-by-warning-of-similar-chinese-tech-advances https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/28729/docs-show-navy-g...
1 - https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en https://patents.google.com/patent/US10144532B2/en
- heed 5y agoI came across an interesting theory on why the gov’t is being more open about UAV observations in a HN comment a while back - paraphrasing: Pilots may be under-reporting UAV sitings due to the fear of being labeled as crackpots and or dismissed. By speaking more openly about the subject the gov’t is signaling that it’s okay to talk about and shouldn’t be ridiculed.