3 ms·
Sounds like you are in one of the camps. If you are going to call out "the science" and speak disparagingly, you'd better provide references. Preferably compre
by colordrops 5y ago
Sounds like you are in one of the camps.
If you are going to call out "the science" and speak disparagingly, you'd better provide references. Preferably comprehensive analysis, and not a few cherry picked studies. Otherwise you are just adding to the noise.
- tpush 5y agoYou are free to peruse the reports by pretty much every national nutrition & dietetics organization in the world; they already did the hard work of combing through and evaluating all relevant studies in that area. Any individual "assessment" of the scientific literature by someone who doesn't have scientific training in general or in that particular area is much more likely to result misleading or even dangerous conclusions.
- colordrops 5y agoAre you saying you have scientific training in the area? Because you made a clear assessment.
- tpush 5y agoNo, I repeated the position of organizations like the AHA, not read a couple studies and made up my own mind.
- colordrops 5y agoOK, presumably you'd also need scientific training to discount papers and theories as well. How are you coming to the conclusion about the quackery of other theories?