4 ms·
Three metrics you pointed out: 1. Linter 2. Cyclomatic/halstead complexity 3. identifier naming convention testing Are those really things that candidates can
by murtali 5y ago
Three metrics you pointed out:
1. Linter
2. Cyclomatic/halstead complexity
3. identifier naming convention testing
Are those really things that candidates can get a negative ding for? Those are things that can/should be handled automatically by libraries or your CI/CD (ex: Rubocop)
More importantly, how do you get more details/nuance over things like naming or cyclomatic complexity.
- moritonal 5y agoI actually really value the naming metric. I'd value a dev who looks at other classes to to see what the convention is rather than just adding their own personal form of camel-case. It shows a sense of collaboration.