5 ms·
Two B-52s circling over Romania
- drclau 5y agoTo the best of my knowledge, this is the closest I’ve ever been to nuclear bombs. I live in Romania.
- WJW 5y agoIf it makes you feel better, it is very unlikely that they contain nuclear weapons. NATO has no interest in bombing anything on Ukrainian soil with nukes. and if the US wants to bomb Russia they would use an ICBM instead of an airplane that is (relatively) easy to shoot down.
- emteycz 5y agoI'd think they'd not rely on one mean of delivery and instead would have as many as possible ready. It's DEFCON 2 here after all.
- rad_gruchalski 5y ago> It's official: B-52 bombers are no longer authorized to carry nuclear gravity bombs," Kristensen said in a tweet earlier this week. "New Air Force instruction describes 'removal of B61-7 and B83-1 from B-52H approved weapons configuration.' > "The B-52 remains the premier stand-off weapons platform utilizing the air-launched cruise missile as the main nuclear deterrent. While B61s and B83s are no longer equipped on the B-52, the weapons remain in the [B-2 Spirit] inventory," https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/01/18/b-52-will-no-longer-carry-certain-nuclear-weapons-heres-why.html https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/01/18/b-52-will-no-...
- captainredbeard 5y agoThey can still fly with nuclear armed cruise missiles, just not gravity bombs (in what environment could something like that be used from a B-52 anyhow?)
- credit_guy 5y agoIf you're trying to say, this is the closest we've been to nuclear war, that's for sure. But to be certain, this is all Russia's fault, not America's.
- drclau 5y agoNo, I literally meant the physical distance between me and a nuke.
- gvb 5y agoCallsign Gorgon 11 and 12. Gorgon: "[T]hree sisters who are described as having hair made of living, venomous snakes and horrifying visages that turned those who beheld them to stone." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgon
- exabrial 5y agoWhat software is that? I'd love to see it in real time rather than screenshots
- tharkun__ 5y agoThey had B52s circling over Warsaw when Russia first started this whole thing too. Just like any other military plane you see on these sites (adsbexchange.com is better because it does not remove military planes and instead makes it easy to filter for them so you see only military planes) you only see them when they want to be seen. Without the transponder switched on you won't see them there. Russia could still see them on radar though. Usually only things like transporters, AWACS and the in air refuelers (Stratotankers and such) fly with transponders on. But ask yourself why there would be a Stratotanker circling all day if there were no fighter jets to refuel? Sometimes you can see a Eurofighter or some such turn on their transponders too when escorting a tanker back or during takeoff and landing.
- 6902bb8a-5cea 5y agoLooks like flightradar24 to me.
- dzhiurgis 5y agofyi- ADSBExchange.com is the uncensored one
- simonblack 5y agoTwo targets flying over Romania. In today's world, a B52 is only useful if the US has absolute air superiority in that airspace. Romanian airspace is a vulnerable location.
- captainredbeard 5y agoThe fidelity (and resilience) of firing solutions decreases with distance. For all practical purposes those B-52s are not vulnerable. B-52s equipped with air launched cruise missiles are very relevant in today's world. It's a flying weapons bank that can be handed firing solutions from other assets (e.g. an F-35 flying stealth in a contested area).