2 ms·
> The main concern of a religion is to stop thinking, to suppress doubt. I've recently been thinking that the main reason why certain religions/ideologies are
by sva_ 5y ago
> The main concern of a religion is to stop thinking, to suppress doubt.
I've recently been thinking that the main reason why certain religions/ideologies are so popular, is in fact, because they release you from the burden of coming up with an answer to some very fundamental questions about life. There is this idea about the brain, that it tries to optimize energy-usage, and if you don't have to ask yourself these fundamental questions all the time, you can spend brainpower on other things. So people naturally follow a regime of dogmas proposed by some authority, to focus on other things in life.
Or as an evolutionary argument: Those who had the luxury of ignoring contemplating their own existence, had the privilege of spending their brainpower on things that helped their community and subsequently helped it spread.
About the topic at hand: I think this modular approach to the mind is misguided. By now I'm almost certain that the brain is compositional, instead. These phenomena described by Minsky surely are emergent, or at least most of them.
- breck 5y agoI've been coming around to this as well, which surprised me as I thought I had left religion for good. > release you from the burden of coming up with an answer to some very fundamental questions about life. I'd even modify this to say "impossible burden". Science reduces to the model: P(A|B). No model is ever safe, since we can never observe the generator of B, and changes in B can turn the whole model irrelevant. So the pursuit of some perfect scientific model of the world is an endeavor with 0% probability of success. Hence, it seems the wiser strategy is to have a strategic balance between religion and science. What that split is, and whether it's most advantageous to do so at the society level or society of mind level, I don't know.