I would discourage turning this conversation into a pissing contest of which ideology is responsible for more harm. (re: darwinism at the start of the 20th cent

I would discourage turning this conversation into a pissing contest of which ideology is responsible for more harm. (re: darwinism at the start of the 20th century) I would much rather explore how the two can coexist. Does a material and immaterial explanation of reality make sense?