3 ms·
You're making a huge logical leap assuming that artificial scarcity is the only reason that we produce non-physical goods, and that's easily contradicted by the
by blurker 5y ago
You're making a huge logical leap assuming that artificial scarcity is the only reason that we produce non-physical goods, and that's easily contradicted by the existence of FOSS. There are plenty of creators who create things for all sorts of reasons besides profit. And in many cases, there are people who want to create free things and can't because of things like patents and IP trolls preventing them from doing it.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- otterley 5y ago> that artificial scarcity is the only reason that we produce non-physical goods (Emphasis mine.) Who said that? Certainly not me. Acts of charity happen all the time, and we are doubtless better off for them. But those are a choice. It doesn't mean it should be the only choice.
- blurker 5y agoHere: > Unfortunately, unless we're all going back to a society in which people can only produce things that are physically scarce, like food, we need artificial scarcity You said that unless we have artificial scarcity, we are all going back to a society where people only produce physically scarce things.
- thot_experiment 5y agoCharity isn't somehow the only other choice, not that this would be my ideal solution but I think we could still have some working version of capitalism where intellectual property was greatly undermined and everyone was better off for it.