As someone often advocating for not building features, after playing with this a little bit I do think some of the constants* behind it's formula are a little o

As someone often advocating for not building features, after playing with this a little bit I do think some of the constants* behind it's formula are a little off toward the pessimistic/negative outcome. If a very complex feature is of true high value to 90% of my users, it seems uncontroversially worthwhile: the tool gives me "No, but a close call (48%)" I'd suggest putting a little more weight on value & user importance and a little less weight on complexity/effort. Otherwise, GREAT tool. Even just as an aid to get across the idea that some features should not be built, which is often not understood. *for reference, weights are currently as follows: # users: 10 effort: -15 user importance: 20 biz complexity: -15 value: 20 risk: -20