4 ms·
This post smells of propaganda and queue-anon promulgators. (OP’s post history is quite telling.) Not once did the Wikipedia creator mention (Z)apad or (V)osto
by hbarka 5y ago
This post smells of propaganda and queue-anon promulgators. (OP’s post history is quite telling.)
Not once did the Wikipedia creator mention (Z)apad or (V)ostok. These vehicles are designated such to mark their order of battle during the pre-invasion pretend exercises that they came from—-West/Zapad or East/Vostok. Western brigades and divisions also have identifiers.
What is it with myth-creators and their gravitation toward symbols?
- p_l 5y agoZapad is mentioned, both as meaning of "Z" and in relation to Zapad exercises.
- hdjjhhvvhga 5y agoYou probably haven't read the whole entry.
- waffleiron 5y ago> Please don't comment on whether someone read an article. "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- hdjjhhvvhga 5y agoIn general, yes. But the parent specifically says that the Wikipedia entry doesn't mention something whereas it actually mentions it, so I assumed they haven't read the whole thing.
- hbarka 5y agoThe initial commit was devoid of that fact. I still contend the Wikipedia initial entry was created for myth-making. It’s a good thing it can be edited.