> Disagree here. A 52% majority is no basis for far-reaching, long-term constitutional change Especially one with a bunch of negotiations and interpretations a

> Disagree here. A 52% majority is no basis for far-reaching, long-term constitutional change Especially one with a bunch of negotiations and interpretations and unknowns and fantasies and dire consequences attached to it. Referendum-driven democracy of this sort is a disaster area. People shouldn't have been allowed to vote directly on this kind of a proposition until it had been negotiated in detail.