In my experience, code review often becomes a rubber stamping exercise. Reviewers only add trivial feedback and stop short of adding actual constructive critici

In my experience, code review often becomes a rubber stamping exercise. Reviewers only add trivial feedback and stop short of adding actual constructive criticism or feedback, either because they don't want to look like an arsehole, or because they don't have time. That said, it's not an intrinsic problem with code review, but a team culture problem.