4 ms·
It's censorship of enemy's propaganda vehicle. Since when is that considered "bad"?
by keymone 5y ago
It's censorship of enemy's propaganda vehicle. Since when is that considered "bad"?
- shabier 5y agoYeah, sure, let's completely depend on our own honest media rather than being able to cross-check it with opposing parties. It surely won't create an echo chamber wherein our own media could report whatever they want, it surely won't result in less objective reporting and more propaganda.
- keymone 5y agothe issue now is not "how good of a reporting does this or that media produce?" the issue is "a literal fascist government is invading a sovereign country and their propaganda machine is in full throttle mode".
- shabier 5y ago> the issue is "a literal fascist government is invading a sovereign country and their propaganda machine is in full throttle mode". Explain to me how you would come to that conclusion if it wasn't for the media? And how would you justify spreading that information if it came from "not really accurate or objective" media? Without being able to cross-check, you're just spreading one-sided gossip, if not rumors like the snake island story.
- keymone 5y agoi am ukrainian and i am in contact with multiple people affected on the ground.
- shabier 5y ago
- keymone 5y ago> doesn't make your take any more credible it makes my awareness of the situation on the ground stronger > 1) support censorship of enemy's propaganda vehicle. wonder why would you omit that little fact. getting paid to do so? > 2) don't care to verify stories you lying sack of shit. > 3) are under the impression that being Ukrainian makes your take automatically truthful you lying sack of shit.