41 ms·
Kind of sad for digital version of latest by Tears for Fears https://magicvinyldigital.net/2022/03/04/tears-for-fears-the-tipping-point-review-lp-cd-qobuz-tidal
by yannikyeo 5y ago
Kind of sad for digital version of latest by Tears for Fears https://magicvinyldigital.net/2022/03/04/tears-for-fears-the-tipping-point-review-lp-cd-qobuz-tidal-amazon-atmos-blu-ray-audio/ https://magicvinyldigital.net/2022/03/04/tears-for-fears-the... Its common for CDs in the 80s and early 90s to have DR12-DR14. Nowadays its only DR6-DR8. Why don't modern mastering engineers wake up to this regression?
- pbronez 5y agoI think it's a combination of things. - Showroom effect. You want to put your best foot forward when a consumer is only dipping in for a moment. Louder grabs attention harder. - Crappy consumer stereo equipment. Low sensitivity, poor linearity, disposable earbuds and android phone speakers are the default. There's no room for nuance on those systems.
- yannikyeo 5y agoThe high res version has a crappy DR, which is not expected, which means the only way to get a good digital version is to rip from vinyl. I understand the need to cater for low-end consumer equipment. It can be done by having good DR for vinyl , a good DR version for high-res Flac and physical Hybrid SACD and physical CD, and a loudness version for lossless/lossy streaming. It is safe to say most people who listen to Hybrid SACD/CD/High-Res Flac will have sufficient hi-fi equipments.