4 ms·
Oh no, sorry for the confusion: I wasn't referring to Myers algorithm, you made it clear in your comment that it is generally faster! That's impressively conci
by vanderZwan 5y ago
Oh no, sorry for the confusion: I wasn't referring to Myers algorithm, you made it clear in your comment that it is generally faster!
That's impressively concise, although I get the feeling that I should read the papers you alleged to earlier to actually grok it :)
- cb321 5y agoFair enough. IMO, Hyyro's description is easier to follow than Myers' own which may be the real explanation for its relative obscurity. Re: concision - an incomplete summary of why I like Nim is that it is more concise than Python, as fast as C, and safe, both in its metaprogramming and otherwise.