3 ms·
> physical vs psychological dependence is kind of outdated I wouldn't say outdated, but I do agree it is 100% up for debate. Kurzgesagt did a really similar v
by irjustin 5y ago
> physical vs psychological dependence is kind of outdated
I wouldn't say outdated, but I do agree it is 100% up for debate.
Kurzgesagt did a really similar video[0] on addiction, but the basically walked it back from such a hard line stance in a correction/update video[1]. It's not so easy to tease apart the social vs the physical vs the pure mental.
> Just the same, you can be addicted to coffee. Caffeine is a drug.
Right, I think you're agreeing with me. That they have similar aspects, but to treat them the same - like putting caffine on Class 1 - would be insane.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdJAQZxJ6vY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdJAQZxJ6vY
[1] https://youtu.be/JtUAAXe_0VI?t=224 https://youtu.be/JtUAAXe_0VI?t=224
- snek_case 5y agoI'm assuming you mean schedule 1. Nobody is suggesting that coffee should be placed in that category. I don't think there's a problem in society with people equating coffee or videogames with highly addictive drugs. It's more the opposite. People don't realize that addiction is something that could happen to them, or that they have an addiction to something. Alcoholics and drug addicts often live in denial, even when it has really damaging consequences in their life. So, if someone is addicted to something that's not widely considered addictive, it's even easier to deny that this is even a problem. When the idea of an addiction to porn or videogames is brought up in an online discussion thread, people are quick to dismiss that this even is a real problem. Consider though that gambling addiction is very much real, and a lot of gambling takes places with machines that are effectively simple videogames. Addiction to video games isn't as devastating, because you're not losing huge sums of money, just time, but presumably, the addictive mechanism is more or less the same.