3 ms·
As an avid Apple user, I can't stand their naming conventions. I don't have any idea if High Sierra came before or after Mojave, or if Lion was before or after
by _AzMoo 5y ago
As an avid Apple user, I can't stand their naming conventions. I don't have any idea if High Sierra came before or after Mojave, or if Lion was before or after Mountain Lion. I would much prefer version numbers/years.
- spsful 5y agoBut they do? Each version of macOS is numbered. We're on macOS 12 right now.
- itslennysfault 5y agoHonestly, I had no idea. I recently had to have my MBP repaired (new logic board... as always). So, I got it back with the latest OS (Monterey). I needed to download some software that was for specific versions of MacOS, and I honestly didn't even know there was a OS 12. I thought I was still on "OSX". If it wasn't "Monterey" and was just MacOS 12 there would've been no confusion. I feel like it's always an exercise of looking up the code name to find the version whenever someone is like "Yeah, I'm on Big Sur" .... ok one sec, let me google what that even means.
- pknomad 5y agoI spent some time as CPE so I guess the naming convention always made sense? You went from lesser cats to greater cats and now to different sites in CA. Each naming always comes with a version number to fall back on...
- gruez 5y agoThat doesn't help when people like to refer to the version by its name only, omitting the number, which forces you to do a lookup against wikipedia or whatever.
- d110af5ccf 5y agoYup, I also hate this in the Linux world. Debian Bullseye? Ubuntu Focal? WTF? Ubuntu 20.04LTS thank you very much please cease and desist with the "cute" names that force me to consult a chart every time I encounter them. iPhone 10, Galaxy S7, RX470, such product names are significantly easier to keep track of.
- hexane360 5y agoDebian, Ubuntu, and Android names are all alphabetical, so you can tell which versions are newer and older. That's all version numbers are really useful for anyways.
- 0cVlTeIATBs 5y agoVersion numbers can also tell you the date of the release.
- npteljes 5y agoDebian is definitely not alphabetical https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history
- d110af5ccf 5y agoJust checked. Android and Ubuntu, yes. TIL. Debian I don't think so though? It goes Jessie(8), Stretch(9), Buster(10), Bullseye(11). Many other examples of non-alphabetical products exist. Regardless, numbers are easier to work with, easier to remember, and it's immediately apparent what's going on with them. "debootstrap focal target" is more difficult to remember than a hypothetical "debootstrap ubuntu 20.04 target" would be. In practice I have to consult a chart almost every time.
- muterad_murilax 5y agoSo, Impish Indri vs. Intrepid Ibex - which one is newer? ;)
- Angostura 5y agoMountain Lion was after Lion - Snow Leopard Leopard. IN fact I think I can remeber all the cat ordering. But as someone in the UK random californian landmarks are inpossible to remember.