3 ms·
> This workflow ensures any work for minor version upgrade is part of the development workflow. PMs can't deprioritise this work against more exciting shiny pro
by solatic 5y ago
> This workflow ensures any work for minor version upgrade is part of the development workflow. PMs can't deprioritise this work against more exciting shiny product features. If you include this as separate development tickets, it just tends to get deprioritised until it becomes a big chunk of work.
Instead of your maintenance work being visible, you're hiding it. You're describing an adversarial culture, one where you need to do shadow work because you don't trust management to prioritize necessary maintenance, perhaps one where management doesn't trust engineering to place maintenance in its proper context. I don't think this is an ideal, I think this is sad.
- oxfordmale 5y agoI am not hiding it, I make it integral part of the development process, as it should be. Treating technical debt as a separate work item is asking for problems.