4 ms·
>>Argument? What was I arguing? I read it as a possibly interesting new claim about programming languages. If you just wrote without making/arguing a position
by berntb 15y ago
>>Argument? What was I arguing?
I read it as a possibly interesting new claim about programming languages.
If you just wrote without making/arguing a position, sorry for commenting. And reading.
Edit: That anonymous funs might not be good is totally new to me. I've never seen anything about it, but was willing to read. I hope you at least had fun flaming people... (z0r -- I didn't see a discussion in the article.)
- z0r 15y agoIf you had read the original post, you would have nothing to apologize for.
- parfe 15y agoPython made the decision about blocks nearly two decades ago (1993). Why you expect a cited dissertation crammed into a comment on a 20 year old decision and then how you managed to extrapolate my post to "an interesting new claim about programming languages." is really mind boggling. Do you just expect to be spoon fed information? Put some thought into your next comment before you demand something of another person when you aren't willing to put any effort in yourself.