4 ms·
I did hear ot, I have it and its a dead birth. Not worth the investment. Instead of classic FM broadcast DAB+ might be aside a while next to FM and.then give wa
by jhoechtl 5y ago
I did hear ot, I have it and its a dead birth. Not worth the investment. Instead of classic FM broadcast DAB+ might be aside a while next to FM and.then give way to internet radio.
- emteycz 5y agoNo FM radio was able to stream my favorite songs without cutting off a lot of important tones. That problem is gone with digital, my speakers became the limiting factor.
- ElephantsMyAnus 5y agoAbsolutely not. While FM has a bit lower bandwith than healthy ears, digital adds fake high frequencies. There is just no way to cram enough data in the same signal to make digital any better.
- skyde 5y agoeven with AAC compression ?
- ElephantsMyAnus 5y agoI guess no, or it is barely worth it. The thing is that FM is very robust. It only needs to be a little bit stronger than competing signals, which doesn't really give much room for data, considering that the typical bandwith is 150kHz or even less in some countries. Which means you could cram in some 150-200kbps before the reception becomes clearly worse, or you need more power than for FM.