3 ms·
Look at the Serrapeptidase entry. Then do a cursory search on google on the same and then on google scholar. You will see the amount of information missing fro
by xtracto 5y ago
Look at the Serrapeptidase entry. Then do a cursory search on google on the same and then on google scholar.
You will see the amount of information missing from the wiki page.(compare with Serrapeptidase entry on say drugs.com).
Then look at the Talk page of the entry. You'll see the editorial battle there with some "power editors" squashing any attempt to correct the page.
- zozbot234 5y agoI've looked at the talk page and there are no proposals for actionable changes to the article. With these controversial or WP:OWN'd articles, you really need to post the equivalent of a pull request: "I want to change text A to B, supported by reliable references X, Y and Z". If nobody at all replies, post also to the related WikiProject talk pages to solicit comments from a broader audience. If no one disagrees even then, then you can be WP:BOLD and make the edit, since you'll be able to point out that you were looking for a proper consensus.
- xtracto 5y agoI've no idea at all about wikipedia inner workings. I'm mostly just an occasional reader. I was just surprised at how little information it had about Serrapeptidase when I saw it and curiously checked the talk page. It showed me the type of politics and game that can happen behind wikipedia. I really dont care, I just click back and looked at the other better Google results. It's only kind of sad, given wikipedia"s origins/mission (im old enough to remember when wikipedia was created. It's one of the few remnants of the "old" web)