I was confused by this because that text doesn't appear in the article currently. Time for the equivalent of some git bisect[1] using the Internet Archive.. .

I was confused by this because that text doesn't appear in the article currently. Time for the equivalent of some git bisect[1] using the Internet Archive.. ...it looks like a couple of paragraphs in the article changed[2][3] during 2022-03-06: $ diff before after 36c36 < There’s a few things in this email that immediately raised my heckles. If you scroll back up and look at the agreement Paul and I made in January, there was no mention of me not being able to label the content as “sponsored”. --- > When I read Paul’s email from January, I missed the whole ”no sponsored post label“ thing. Reading this new email from Paul with fresh eyes, that part really raised my heckles. I don’t think I would have replied in the first place had I read the original email properly. Silly Kev. 38c38 < Also, and this may just be the way I interpreted the email, but the way he tells me to make it live on my site makes it feel like a demand. --- > Also (and this may just be the way I interpreted the email) the way he tells me to make it live on my site makes it feel like a demand. [1] - https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect https://git-scm.com/docs/git-bisect [2] - before: https://web.archive.org/web/20220306084011/https://kevq.uk/what-happened-when-i-replied-to-a-sponsored-content-email/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220306084011/https://kevq.uk/w... [3] - after: https://web.archive.org/web/20220306110240/https://kevq.uk/what-happened-when-i-replied-to-a-sponsored-content-email/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220306110240/https://kevq.uk/w...