I've got a good counter example: Thwme wikipedia entry on Serrapeptidase is a disgrace. The talk page is very enlightening: a couple of "powerful" editors took

I've got a good counter example: Thwme wikipedia entry on Serrapeptidase is a disgrace. The talk page is very enlightening: a couple of "powerful" editors took the page and created a narrative they want to show. While lots of people are showing plenty of evidence around the web showing other points of view. The result is a very poorly informative wiki page that lacks a lot of the information that can be found in all web sites from the first page results of a Google search.