>Wrong. It was set up to oppose the Soviet Union. Not Russia. I said Moscow. Did Moscow stop being Moscow? >Good thing you mentioned Libya, because that’s the

>Wrong. It was set up to oppose the Soviet Union. Not Russia. I said Moscow. Did Moscow stop being Moscow? >Good thing you mentioned Libya, because that’s the only campaign that NATO involved in an offensive role. One rape makes you a rapist. >an offensive organization that exists for 73 years but has only waged a single war They've waged many. I gave Libya as an example because there are no shades of gray in that war and because it was the war that shaped Putin's view of what NATO's endgame was for Russia (quite fairly, IMHO).