> Strange. How about you put the link in a reply to this comment, and we'll see if it "gets autokilled" (tagged dead). Here it is: https://github.com/laarc/laa

> Strange. How about you put the link in a reply to this comment, and we'll see if it "gets autokilled" (tagged dead). Here it is: https://github.com/laarc/laarc https://github.com/laarc/laarc I put years of work into it. As I said, this comment is dead: https://i.imgur.com/JmMdQ8i.png https://i.imgur.com/JmMdQ8i.png I'm pretty sure this comment can't be vouched, too. > I'm assuming that if that is happening, it is some kind of false positive, not an intentional moderator decision – in which case, someone should be able to vouch your comment and undead it. Heh. It was intentional. Though if Dan ever reverses the decision, he might try to claim otherwise, since technically the goal was to ban mentions of our HN competitor. Feel free to DM me on twitter if you want to discuss it further. https://twitter.com/theshawwn https://twitter.com/theshawwn