3 ms·

I think he's got a solid point when it comes to monitor resolutions. For a 27" monitor the perfect resolution seems to be about 5K and just aren't really any o

by Lio 5y ago

I think he's got a solid point when it comes to monitor resolutions. For a 27" monitor the perfect resolution seems to be about 5K and just aren't really any other options on the market for a 27" 5K screen other than an iMac right now. If you want a decent screen for text work it's probably not a bad idea to buy a used iMac and work out how to display text on it but it's not a clean solution. e.g. I could personally use tmux running on the iMac or something but it's messy. It seems to a shame to needlessly generate eWaste when there's not really a better screen on the market new. I don't get his height adjustment argument. It's a pain in the arse but you can pretty easily buy a VESA adapter for an iMac and a height adjustable arm off the shelf.

goosedragons 5y ago
There's the LG Ultrafine 5K. Apple even sells it. I'm pretty sure it's literally the same panel as the iMac. The iMac except for the Pro aren't easily VESA adaptable after purchase. Like you can't remove the original stand. Really it should be at the very least height adjustable at this point. But it's pretty sad when a $200 monitor will have better ergonomics than a $2000 all in one. The desktop monitor market is mostly driven by PC gamers and businesses who don't want the highest resolutions for different reasons.
- tonyedgecombe 5y ago
  >Apple even sells it. I'm pretty sure it's literally the same panel as the iMac. It is. >The desktop monitor market is mostly driven by ... I'm always surprised that so many people buy large monitors whilst ignoring the resolution. Big is better seems to be the mantra when it comes to monitors and probably most other consumer goods.
  - goosedragons 5y ago
    Gamers want higher refresh rates and pushing 5K@144Hz is really expensive from a GPU side vs. 1440p@144hz. While text looks better at 5K, it's less noticeable for games. So big is better but it's a different tradeoff. Businesses are just cheap and 1080p screens are good enough.
- ei8htyfi5e 5y ago
  I’ve compared them side by side and they are not the same. Maybe it’s software but fonts are noticeably crisper on the iMac screen can the LG panels.

by Lio 5y ago

goosedragons 5y ago

There's the LG Ultrafine 5K. Apple even sells it. I'm pretty sure it's literally the same panel as the iMac. The iMac except for the Pro aren't easily VESA adaptable after purchase. Like you can't remove the original stand. Really it should be at the very least height adjustable at this point. But it's pretty sad when a $200 monitor will have better ergonomics than a $2000 all in one. The desktop monitor market is mostly driven by PC gamers and businesses who don't want the highest resolutions for different reasons.

tonyedgecombe 5y ago
>Apple even sells it. I'm pretty sure it's literally the same panel as the iMac. It is. >The desktop monitor market is mostly driven by ... I'm always surprised that so many people buy large monitors whilst ignoring the resolution. Big is better seems to be the mantra when it comes to monitors and probably most other consumer goods.
- goosedragons 5y ago
  Gamers want higher refresh rates and pushing 5K@144Hz is really expensive from a GPU side vs. 1440p@144hz. While text looks better at 5K, it's less noticeable for games. So big is better but it's a different tradeoff. Businesses are just cheap and 1080p screens are good enough.
ei8htyfi5e 5y ago
I’ve compared them side by side and they are not the same. Maybe it’s software but fonts are noticeably crisper on the iMac screen can the LG panels.