3 ms·
This is an extreme position, and IMO unrealistic. The key term here is "a moral-less dumb pipe." I'm not sure it's even realistic to expect "dumb pipes" to me
by netcan 5y ago
This is an extreme position, and IMO unrealistic.
The key term here is "a moral-less dumb pipe."
I'm not sure it's even realistic to expect "dumb pipes" to me morally neutral, but that doesn't matter because Spotify is not trying to be a dumb pipe.
This is about podcasting, so let's stick with that. We already have/had a dumb pipe for podcasting. RSS. Podcasting is more free than most online media specifically for this reason. It uses an open protocol instead of a corporate platform. Notice how there is no post about RSS' policy regarding this war.
Spotify is, currently, trying to obtain exclusivity over top podcasts... taking podcasts off the "dumb pipe." The goal is to eventually dominate podcasting as they do streaming music. That's the opposite of platform neutrality, dumb pipes, decentralized moral choices, etc.
If you want dumb pipes, that idea is not really compatible with corporate fiefdoms in 2022 practice.
- roenxi 5y ago> This is an extreme position, and IMO unrealistic. We're watching an escalating conflict that could easily involve nuclear armed powers. Maybe we should try something extreme that doesn't involve asking Spotify to escalate the situation further? Heaven help us, now is the time to be de-escalating rather than throwing more sticks and stones at Russia that do nothing but annoy people.
- netcan 5y agoI don't see how this relates to my comment. Where did I imply that spotify should escalate, or do anything for that matter?