4 ms·
This seems like a very open ended problem still. Surely there is much more hidden information in the way people write which has not been utilized widely yet. I’
by lwansbrough 5y ago
This seems like a very open ended problem still. Surely there is much more hidden information in the way people write which has not been utilized widely yet. I’m reminded of when 80% accuracy in computer vision classification nets were state of the art. You need more data. And, I think, more transient data. Cliques develop lingo that falls in and out of fashion quickly.
For instance I know why I started one of the above sentences with “Surely” (not something I did often until recently) and it could be traceable to at least one specific internet community if you had all the conversation data. A few more layers like that in a neural net and you’ve got a pretty good fingerprint.