3 ms·
Interpretation is a crutch, gives nothing extra, and only obfuscates things; it should be discarded. Let's just accept that (1) we don't know the objective rea
by pishpash 5y ago
Interpretation is a crutch, gives nothing extra, and only obfuscates things; it should be discarded.
Let's just accept that (1) we don't know the objective reality, and (2) there is something that ensures consistency of information across fairly large distances -- entanglement experiments have been done up to 1000+ km's -- maybe even across the entire universe, though the latter has never been tested.
- tome 5y ago> entanglement experiments have been done up to 1000+ km's Do you have a link to more info on that? I've never heard of such an experiment and I'd be interested how you send entangled particles 1000+ kms without disturbing them in a way that invalidates the experiment.
- Dudeman112 5y ago>Interpretation is a crutch, gives nothing extra, and only obfuscates things; it should be discarded. It assists people in considering where the models might go and make them think of experiments to invalidate/validate the interpretation. They are as good as any hypothesis and there is a point when you have to guess what things might be, even if you are not sure yet. You can't move forward without conjecture at some point.