3 ms·
Personally I don't. It's not speech from an American but rather a foreign country (or sometimes not even a human). And it incites harm, which is one of the res
by dillondoyle 5y ago
Personally I don't. It's not speech from an American but rather a foreign country (or sometimes not even a human).
And it incites harm, which is one of the restrictions that can be placed on speech.
- Handytinge 5y agoYou support freedom of speech, but only for citizens of your country?
- dillondoyle 5y agoI support other countries establishing free speech laws. And in general the protection of non-US citizen speech within the US, especially foreign reporters. But that doesn't have anything to do with constitutionally protecting 3rd party nations using platforms/speech for propaganda in our (or any other opposing) country. Seems ridiculous on its face to try to confuse or equate the two and argue the point.