3 ms·
I am also conflicted trusting an agency that's other job is to make networks less safe when it comes to network safety. The conflict of interest alone if enough
by number6 5y ago
I am also conflicted trusting an agency that's other job is to make networks less safe when it comes to network safety.
The conflict of interest alone if enough, it doesn't even need their track records in spying on everyone.
- greggsy 5y agoI highly doubt any of the content in this is ‘bad’ or misleading - most security people have a pretty good BS detector and it would spread pretty quickly in the community. The worst thing might be a reference to an industry standard protocol, like IPSECv2, which is generally considered secure, but might be broken under certain conditions and only ever exploit under extreme circumstances (to avoid showing their hand).
- numpad0 5y ago> to make networks less safe Could it be substituted by "to get into a network"? Then it could be argued that they need adversaries to establish reliance on a working network.