>> Again, this is just like saying that a camera existing enables the government to hack it, so rear view cameras are part of forming a surveillance state. >Th

>> Again, this is just like saying that a camera existing enables the government to hack it, so rear view cameras are part of forming a surveillance state. >That might be the best example of a straw-man that I've ever seen. I think that was the point. Replace "rear view cameras" with "onboard tools to detect and deter/prevent impaired driving" and you have the same straw man.